![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What's New at LI LI Staff Research Projects Training Services LI Bookstore Drug Use Trends Research Tools Research Presentations & Posters Staff Publications Illinois Addiction Studies Archive Links
|
CHS Home > Services > Research & Training > RESEARCH TOOLS
Overview of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems (CSAT grant no. TI 11320) Last updated 03/01/2000)
Background. Dennis and colleagues (1993; 1995; 1996; 1998) have been developing the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) to implement an integrated bio-psycho-social model of treatment assessment, planning and outcome monitoring that can be used for evaluation, clinical practice and administrative purposes. The current version was adapted for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA’s) Center for Substance Abuse Treatment’s (CSAT’s) Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) cooperative agreement study (Dennis, Diamond, Donaldson, Godley, Kaminer, Tims and others, 1998; CSAT TI 11320), but has actually evolved over a half dozen grants from CSAT, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and the Interventions Foundation. The GAIN embeds questions for documenting substance use disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and pathological gambling, (based on APA, 1994), dimensional patient placement criteria for intoxication/withdrawal, health distress, mental distress, and environment distress to guide movement among and between levels of care (based on ASAM, 1996), treatment planning (based on JCAHO, 1995), reporting requirements related to the state client data system (OAS, 1995), and measures of a core set of clinical status and service utilization outcomes used in the Drug Outcome Monitoring Study (DOMS; Dennis et al., 1995). The GAIN focuses on face valid measures of recency, past year symptoms and behavioral counts for the past 90 days because (in addition to use in scales) the individual item answers need to be communicated/understood by a wide range of clients, clinicians and policy makers (Sechrest, McKnight, & McKnight, 1996; JCAHO, 1995). Several of these measures have also been designed to compare with the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA; OAS, 1995), French and Martin’s (1997) estimates of unit cost of drug-related outcomes, and/or other major epidemiological data sets. The instrument has also been set up to be flexible and allow either oral or a proctored (i.e., staff observed) form of self-administration to adults and/or adolescents in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Organization. The content of the GAIN is divided into eight areas: background and treatment arrangements, substance use, physical health, risk behaviors, mental health, environment, legal, and vocational. In each area, the questions check for major problem areas and the recency of any problems. If a given problem occurred in the past year, additional symptom-based questions (e.g., criteria for alcohol dependence) are asked for the past year to clarify the problem. If it occurred in the past 90 days, detailed behavioral counts are collected (e.g., days of alcohol use, days of drinking 5+ drinks per day, etc.). The GAIN also asks detailed questions about lifetime and current (past 90 days) service utilization, as well as changes in the client’s cognitive state (e.g. self efficacy to resist alcohol use, resistance to treatment, motivation to be in treatment, and what services the client currently wants from treatment). Table 1 provides a summary of its core measures related to both clinical status and service utilization. It can be administered orally or initially done as a self-administered assessment by a client (but then needs to be reviewed). It is designed to facilitate clinical reviews by keeping scales in modules on the same page and numbering them together. Versions and Administration Time. There are currently two main versions: the GAIN-Initial (Version GAIN-I 12/99: 90 min) and the GAIN-Monitoring 90 days (Version GAIN-M90 12/99: 20 min.). The GAIN-I is a detailed bio-psycho-social that has many "skip outs" so administration time naturally varies depending on how much has been going on in the individual’s life. It also varies by how it is delivered. Table 2 provides data on the time to complete a GAIN-I for 168 adolescents and 73 adults. There is considerable range in the expected duration of the GAIN depending on population, mode and level of care/severity. Adults in general, adults entering outpatient treatment and adolescents entering short-term residential treatment generally took longer. Oral administration was always faster - often by 20% or more. Other administration refers to doing a proctored self-administration (i.e., with staff present), doing this and oral on some parts, and/or doing split assessments. The latter involves asking a select number of items to decide whether to admit and where to place someone (about 20 minutes), then going back over the whole assessment to complete the information with only those who were admitted after they were in treatment (time estimates are only for those who did get admitted and completed the whole assessment). Because it contains fewer skip-able questions and is orally administered, administration time on the GAIN-M90 is almost always completed within 15-30 minutes with a median time of approximately 22 minutes. Summary of Psychometrics. In both adolescent and adult outpatient and inpatient samples, the GAIN has repeatedly demonstrated excellent internal consistency on core scales related to the frequency of substance use (alpha=.8+), alcohol use (alpha=.9+), drug use disorders (Cronbach’s alpha =.9+), and alcohol use disorders (alpha=.9+). The drug frequency index (days of use, days of heavy use, days of problem use, days of marijuana use, days of cocaine use, days of heroin use) is more correlated with lifetime drug problems (r=.36, p <.0001) than days of any use alone is (r=.29, p<.0001). The alcohol frequency index (days of use, days of heavy use and days of use causing problems) is more correlated with our measure of lifetime alcohol problems (r=.51, p<.0001) than simple days of alcohol use (r=.41, p<.0001). Excellent internal consistency has also been established for measures of general mental distress, PTSD, ADHD, conduct disorder, traumatic victimization, social support, environmental risk, illegal activity, and school problems. Table 3 provides a summary of the internal consistency for an initial sample of 136 adolescents and 211 adults (Dennis, Funk, et al., 1998). For both adults and adolescents, the GAIN is also able to reliably predict initial level of care placements (Kappa .4-.6 depending on model) and clinical subgroups that are used for making case mix adjustments between treatment units or levels of care (Kappa=.85 to .89 depending on model). The former is more reliable than most modern psychiatric diagnostic tests (which typically range from .4 to .6), and the latter is considered close to perfect (Kraemer, 1992). Copyright and Availability. The GAIN and its products are tools that are proprietary products owned by Chestnut Health Systems either exclusively or jointly and protected under U.S. copyright laws. The current work is in beta test form, but can be used for evaluation and research under a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited license at the cost of $1 plus any materials/assistance requested. Copies of the instruments, general terms of the license agreement and other products can be downloaded for inspection-only from www.chestnut.org/li/cyt/gain. For hard copies or further assistance please contact Joan Unsikcer by e-mail at junsicker@chestnut.org or directly at the Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, 720 West Chestnut, Bloomington IL, 61701, Telephone: 309-827-6026, Fax : 309-829-4661.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Society of Addictive Medicine. (1996). Patient placement criteria for the treatment of psychoactive substance disorders. (2nd ed.). Chevy Chase, MD: Author. Dennis, M.L. (1998). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual: Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, (Prepared with funds from CSAT TI 11320). Bloomington, Il: Lighthouse Publications. Dennis, M.L., Diamond, G., Donaldson, J., Godley, S., Kaminer, Y., Tims, F., and 27 others (1998). Research Design and General Protocol for CSAT’s Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Cooperative Agreement. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. Dennis, M.L., Fairbank, J.A., Caddell, J.M., Bonito, A.J., Rourke, K.M., Woods, M.G., Rachal, J.V. Bossert, K., & Burke, M. (1995). Individualized Substance Abuse Counseling (ISAC) manual. Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications. (NIDA Grant Nos. 1-R18-DA-7262 and R01-DA-07864). Dennis, M., Funk, R, McDermeit, M., Godley, M., Scott, C., and Godley, S. (1998). Towards Better Placement and Case Mix Adjustments in Adolescent and Adult Substance Abuse Treatment Systems. Invited paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Treatment of Addictive Behavior; Sante Fe, NM January 10-15, 1998. Dennis, M.L., Godley, M.D., Scott, C. K., Foss, M., Senay, E., & Bokos, P.J. (1995). Drug Outcome Monitoring Study (DOMS): Preliminary Research Design, (funded by the Interventions Foundation). Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. Dennis, M.L., Rourke, K.M., & Caddell, J.M. (1993). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs: Administration manual (NIDA Grant No. R01-DA07864). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Dennis, M.L., Rourke, K.M., Lucas, R.L., Zien, C., Clayton, K.J., Harris, K.M., Caddell, J.M., Cavanaugh, B.R., & Fleischman, D. (1995). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Resource manual (NIDA Grant No. R01-DA07864). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. Dennis, M.L., Senay, M., White, W., Webber, R., Moran, M., Sodetz, A. (1996). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual. Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, (prepared under funds from the Interventions Foundation). Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications. Dennis, M.L., Woods, M.G.,Becnel, J., & Ray, S. (1995). New Orleans Target Cities Project: Evaluation Workplan. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. French, M.T., & Martin, R.F. (1997). The costs of drug abuse consequences: A summary of research findings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13(6), 453-466. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare. (1995). Accreditation Manual for Mental Health, Chemical Dependency, and Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities Services. Vol. 1, Standards. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Author. Office of Applied Statistics (OAS). (1993). Client data system. Rockville, MD: Author. Office of Applied Statistics (OAS). (1995). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Kraemer, H.C. (1992). Evaluating medical tests. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Sechrest, L., McNight, P., & McNight, K. (1996). Calibration of measures for psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1065-1071. Table 1 Areas of the Assessment in the GAIN
‡ Designed for comparison with the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA; OAS, 1995).
§ Designed for use with French and Martin’s (1996) estimates of unit cost of drug-related outcomes. ¥ Designed for comparison with other epidemiological data sets * Repeated at follow-up in some studies. Note: Core data collected in all versions. All data collected at baseline administration of GAIN-I. Source: Dennis, M.L. (1998). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual: Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, (Prepared with funds from CSAT TI 11320). Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications. Table 2. Time to Administer the GAIN by Population, Mode, and Level of Care
Source: Dennis, M.L. (1998). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual: Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, (Prepared with funds from CSAT TI 11320). Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications.
Table 3. Reliability of Scales
\1 Reliability goes up with age;
\2 Extremely low rates of health problems report on GAIN and in physical exams;
\3 This is a list of potentially unrelated factors in a formative index; \4 Environmental risks are very heterogenous.
Source: Dennis, M.L. (1998). Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual: Administration, Scoring and Interpretation, (Prepared with funds from CSAT TI 11320). Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||