![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SASATE - Society for Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Effectiveness Provided by Chestnut Health Systems under SAMHSA contract 270-2003-00006 Dennis, M. L., Godley, S. H., Diamond, G., Tims, F. M., Babor, T., Donaldson, J., Liddle, H., Titus, J. C., Kaminer, Y.,Webb, C., Hamilton, N., & Funk, R. (2004). The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 197-213. ABSTRACT This article presents the main outcome findings from two inter-related randomized trials conducted at four sites to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of five short-term outpatient interventions for adolescents with cannabis use disorders. Trial 1 compared five sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) with a 12-session regimen of MET and CBT (MET/CBT12) and another that included family education and therapy components (Family Support Network [FSN]). Trial II compared the five-session MET/CBT with the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (ACRA) and Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT). The 600 cannabis users were predominately white males, aged 15-16. All five CYT interventions demonstrated significant pre-post treatment improvements during the 12 months after random assignment to a treatment intervention in the two main outcomes: days of abstinence and the percent of adolescents in recovery (no use or abuse/dependence problems and living in the community). Overall, the clinical outcomes were very similar across sites and conditions; however, after controlling for initial severity, the most cost-effective interventions were MET/CBT5 and MET/CBT12 in Trial 1 and ACRA and MET/CBT5 in Trial 2. It is possible that the similar results occurred because outcomes were driven more by general factors beyond the treatment approaches tested in this study; or because of shared, general helping factors across therapies that helped these teens attend to and decrease their connection to cannabis and alcohol. To request copies - e-mail "SASATE at Chestnut" <SASATE@chestnut.org> directly. You may also be interested in the following commentary related to it.... 1. Compton, W.M., & Pringle, B. (2004). Services research on adolescent drug treatment. Commentary on The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 195-196. To request copies - please e-mail "Wilson Compton (NIDA)" <wcompton@nida.nih.gov> directly. To request copies - please e-mail "SASATE at Chestnut" <SASATE@chestnut.org> directly.
APSS Home |
SASATE Home
Next Conference | Listserv | Meetings | Funding | Resources | Announcements | Contacts This intranet is maintained by Chestnut Health
Systems under Contract No. 270-2003-00006 with the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center
for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), and under Grant No. 047266 with the
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). The information and the opinions
expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent
official positions of the government, RWJF, or any other organization. If you have difficulty using this site, please contact
webmaster@chestnut.org.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||