Chestnut Health Systems About ChestnutServicessearch
Research and Training - Lighthouse Institute


APSS HOME

 

          SASATE HOME

          

          NEXT CONFERENCE

          

          LISTSERV

          

          MEETINGS

          

          FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

          

          RESOURCES

          

          ANNOUNCEMENTS

          

          CONTACTS

          

          

          

          

          

CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS

 

LIGHTHOUSE INSTITUTE


SASATE - Society for Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Effectiveness
Provided by Chestnut Health Systems under SAMHSA contract 270-2003-00006

Dennis, M. L., Godley, S. H., Diamond, G., Tims, F. M., Babor, T., Donaldson, J., Liddle, H., Titus, J. C., Kaminer, Y.,Webb, C., Hamilton, N., & Funk, R. (2004). The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 197-213.

ABSTRACT

This article presents the main outcome findings from two inter-related randomized trials conducted at four sites to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of five short-term outpatient interventions for adolescents with cannabis use disorders. Trial 1 compared five sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT) with a 12-session regimen of MET and CBT (MET/CBT12) and another that included family education and therapy components (Family Support Network [FSN]).  Trial II compared the five-session MET/CBT with the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (ACRA) and Multidimensional  Family Therapy (MDFT). The 600 cannabis users were predominately white males, aged 15-16. All five CYT interventions demonstrated significant pre-post treatment improvements during the 12 months after random assignment to a treatment intervention in the two main outcomes: days of abstinence and the percent of adolescents in recovery (no use or abuse/dependence problems and living in the community). Overall, the clinical outcomes were very similar across sites and conditions; however, after controlling for initial severity, the most cost-effective interventions were MET/CBT5 and MET/CBT12 in Trial 1 and ACRA and MET/CBT5 in Trial 2. It is possible that the similar results occurred because outcomes were driven more by general factors beyond the treatment approaches tested in this study; or because of shared, general helping factors across therapies that helped these teens attend to and decrease their connection to cannabis and alcohol.

To request copies - e-mail "SASATE at Chestnut" <SASATE@chestnut.org> directly.

You may also be interested in the following commentary related to it....

1. Compton, W.M., & Pringle, B. (2004). Services research on adolescent drug treatment. Commentary on The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: Main findings from two randomized trials.  Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 195-196.

To request copies - please e-mail "Wilson Compton (NIDA)" <wcompton@nida.nih.gov> directly.

2. Michael T. French, M. Christopher Roebuck, Michael L. Dennis, Susan H. Godley, Howard A. Liddle and Frank M. Tims (2003).  Outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: Economic Evaluation of a Multisite Field Experiment.  Evaluation Review, 27 (4), 421-459.

To request copies - please e-mail "SASATE at Chestnut" <SASATE@chestnut.org> directly.

[Return to Recent Articles]


APSS Home | SASATE Home
Next Conference | Listserv | Meetings | Funding | Resources | Announcements | Contacts

This intranet is maintained by Chestnut Health Systems under Contract No. 270-2003-00006 with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), and under Grant No. 047266 with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). The information and the opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent official positions of the government, RWJF, or any other organization. If you have difficulty using this site, please contact webmaster@chestnut.org.